 |
Distal humerus Fracture Discussion
Distal humeral fractures in adults may be described by a variety of
classification systems. From a prognostic point of view, they fall into
four general groups: supracondylar - extraarticular, transcondylar -
intraarticular, unicondylar - intraarticular, and bicondylar -
intraarticular. Fractures of the distal humerus have been classified by the
ASIF group as follows:
A Supracondylar - Extraarticular
A1 Epicondylar Avulsion Fracture
A2 Simple Metaphyseal Fracture
A3 Comminuted Metaphyseal Fracture
B Unicondylar
B1 Sagittal Plane: Lateral condylar, including capitellum
B2 Sagittal Plane: Medial condylar, including trochlea
B3 Frontal Plane
B3.1 Capitellum
B3.2 Medial Condylar - capitellum
C Transcondylar: Bicondylar or Intercondylar
C1 Simple articular, Simple Metaphyseal
C2 Simple articular, Comminuted Metaphyseal
C3 Comminuted Articular
Management of these fractures depends on the global picture as well as the
specific fracture pattern. Although the exact choice of treatment is
controversial, open reduction and internal fixation is indicated for most
intraarticular, unstable or severely comminuted fractures, when possible.
Roughly three quarters of patients requiring open reduction for
intraarticular fractures have a satisfactory outcome. Typical standards for
an acceptable result are at least a 75 degree arc of flexion / extension,
only slight pain, and an ability to perform the activities of daily living.
The main problem associated with all of these injuries is permanent loss of
range of flexion and extension of the elbow. Normal use of the elbow
requires an average arc of elbow motion of 100 degrees, from 30 to 130
degrees. Other problems include pain, instability, avascular necrosis,
nonunion, visible deformity, weakness and loss of pronation and supination
of the forearm. By six years after injury, the majority of patients with
intraarticular distal humeral fractures demonstrate radiographic evidence
of posttraumatic arthritis. This is even more common following
fracture-dislocations. Results following secondary surgery are also
frequently disappointing: only one third of patients have a surgery for
distal humeral nonunion can be expected to have a satisfactory functional
result. Patients' assessment and satisfaction with the final result is
difficult to predict, and frequently does not correlate with objective
clinical evaluation. Clinical evaluation and patient satisfaction do not
correlate well with radiographic findings. Because of this, disability may
not be reflected accurately by an impairment rating evaluation. Following
injury, many patients are unable to return to their prior occupation and
experience long term difficulties with sports and activities of daily
living.
Discussion Home Page
 |
American Society for Surgery of the Hand assh.org
The Best Resource For Your Hands, Period.
|